Concorde could have been saved by a new drug to prevent aneurysms and other bleeding in the airbag, experts say.
This is according to a study by researchers at Concordia Pharmaceuticals.
The drug could reduce the risk of aneurisms, bleeding in an aircraft cabin and other catastrophic injuries.
Concordia Pharmaceutical Co (CCP), the manufacturer of Concorde, has released a statement in which it said the study was the “first to show that it has a beneficial effect in preventing aneurymas and other adverse events in airbag-equipped vehicles”.
“We believe that this is the first time that this drug has been shown to have a beneficial action in preventing adverse events,” the statement read.
“In fact, our preliminary data suggests that the drug reduces the risk that aneurism and other potentially fatal events will occur in an airbag vehicle, in addition to providing a more efficient and efficient method of evacuation.”
Conway’s Concorde Airbag has a system in which a small airbag can be attached to a passenger’s airbag and used to reduce the pressure on the vehicle’s airbags.
“We do believe that the findings in this study will help us understand the effectiveness of this innovative device,” said Concordia CEO and co-founder Jean-Marc Lefevre.
“We hope that this study is a step towards further improving the air bag technology, which we believe is the safest option for the safety of all passengers and crew in air-bus and aviation.”
Concorde’s first passenger-carrying aircraft, the Concorde Explorer, had an air bag system that was fitted in the back of the plane.
There are currently four types of air bags: the Airbags, which are used in passenger vehicles and are meant to protect the airbags and seatbelts, as well as the Seatbelts which are also used in aircraft, as a secondary safety mechanism to protect passengers from head injuries and other injuries, and the Airbag Airbag, which was used on Concorde.
Concords new ConcordeAirbag has been fitted on a passenger-carrier, the new Concords new Dreamliner, which has been launched in 2018.
A test flight of the new airbag was held in March, but the researchers said that the test was limited to a small number of people in the test.
In order to assess the effect of the drug on the air bags, the researchers analysed the results of the test flight, and compared the results with those of an unrelated control group.
According to the researchers, the drug did not significantly reduce the number of head injuries or other serious injuries sustained by the test group, although it did reduce the frequency of head and neck injuries.
The researchers found that the results were consistent with a study published in 2017 by a team of researchers from the French Federal Institute of Technology, which looked at the effect that the Concords airbag had on the rate of head injury in passengers.
This study suggested that the use of airbags reduced the risk for head injury, and that a greater proportion of people suffered head injuries when using airbags than when not using airbag technology.
The Concordia study also found that in addition, the air-bag technology was effective in preventing some forms of bleeding in airbags, but not others.
“While the new design of airbag airbags has reduced the incidence of head trauma, this effect was not significant for other types of bleeding and other serious outcomes,” the researchers wrote.
“This is consistent with our hypothesis that this type of air bag is less effective than a traditional airbag in reducing head trauma and other significant injuries.”
The researchers also found the air cushion could be less effective at reducing the risk from head and chest injuries.
“There is evidence that this cushion is more effective than the air cushions used on other air bags in reducing the number and severity of head, chest and neck trauma,” they added.
However, they said that more research was needed to determine the effectiveness and safety of air cushion technology on other injuries.
Dr Mark Jones, a consultant clinical fellow at the University of Newcastle, told the BBC that although the findings were exciting, the study only looked at an impact on the number or severity of serious injuries in air bag-equipped aircraft.
He said it was important to get the right type of tests performed before deploying the technology in the real world, adding that more tests were needed to test whether it would work for other injuries and fatalities.
“The findings should be interpreted with caution as the study is correlational, not causal,” Dr Jones said.
Dr Jones added that he was concerned that the study showed that the air pill would not be effective at preventing other types, such as those associated with trauma or traumatic brain injuries.